<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:series="http://unfoldingneurons.com/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Of Course AT&amp;T Doesn&#8217;t Want Google Voice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rickycadden.com/2009/07/of-course-att-doesnt-want-google-voice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rickycadden.com/2009/07/of-course-att-doesnt-want-google-voice/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=of-course-att-doesnt-want-google-voice</link>
	<description>Just a dude with a phone</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 16:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.rickycadden.com/2009/07/of-course-att-doesnt-want-google-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 19:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickycadden.com/?p=476#comment-324</guid>
		<description>Ricky&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have an unlocked Iphone with 3G unrestrictor, with 3G coverage I assume I could get rid of the voice plan taking into account batter life and 3G coverage issues?  Today Vonage got approved but I am thinking about waiting for Google voice to get approved. What do you think?  I also have Truephone and Skype.  Fring was just too buggy for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ricky</p>
<p>I have an unlocked Iphone with 3G unrestrictor, with 3G coverage I assume I could get rid of the voice plan taking into account batter life and 3G coverage issues?  Today Vonage got approved but I am thinking about waiting for Google voice to get approved. What do you think?  I also have Truephone and Skype.  Fring was just too buggy for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mike</title>
		<link>http://www.rickycadden.com/2009/07/of-course-att-doesnt-want-google-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickycadden.com/?p=476#comment-292</guid>
		<description>Ricky&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have an unlocked Iphone with 3G unrestrictor, with 3G coverage I assume I could get rid of the voice plan taking into account batter life and 3G coverage issues?  Today Vonage got approved but I am thinking about waiting for Google voice to get approved. What do you think?  I also have Truephone and Skype.  Fring was just too buggy for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ricky</p>
<p>I have an unlocked Iphone with 3G unrestrictor, with 3G coverage I assume I could get rid of the voice plan taking into account batter life and 3G coverage issues?  Today Vonage got approved but I am thinking about waiting for Google voice to get approved. What do you think?  I also have Truephone and Skype.  Fring was just too buggy for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Body</title>
		<link>http://www.rickycadden.com/2009/07/of-course-att-doesnt-want-google-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-237</link>
		<dc:creator>James Body</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickycadden.com/?p=476#comment-237</guid>
		<description>Nowhere on net have I seen any indication from Apple as to why the previously approved Google Voice applications have been removed from the iTunes apps store.  

Luckily I managed to download (and pay for) VoiceCentral before the ban.

I would be very interested to hear Apple&#039;s side of the story!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nowhere on net have I seen any indication from Apple as to why the previously approved Google Voice applications have been removed from the iTunes apps store.  </p>
<p>Luckily I managed to download (and pay for) VoiceCentral before the ban.</p>
<p>I would be very interested to hear Apple&#8217;s side of the story!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Body</title>
		<link>http://www.rickycadden.com/2009/07/of-course-att-doesnt-want-google-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-722</link>
		<dc:creator>James Body</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 11:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickycadden.com/?p=476#comment-722</guid>
		<description>Nowhere on net have I seen any indication from Apple as to why the previously approved Google Voice applications have been removed from the iTunes apps store.  

Luckily I managed to download (and pay for) VoiceCentral before the ban.

I would be very interested to hear Apple&#039;s side of the story!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nowhere on net have I seen any indication from Apple as to why the previously approved Google Voice applications have been removed from the iTunes apps store.  </p>
<p>Luckily I managed to download (and pay for) VoiceCentral before the ban.</p>
<p>I would be very interested to hear Apple&#8217;s side of the story!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charbax</title>
		<link>http://www.rickycadden.com/2009/07/of-course-att-doesnt-want-google-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator>Charbax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickycadden.com/?p=476#comment-235</guid>
		<description>In Europe, we can get unlimited data connection plans for less than $20 per month on HSDPA sim cards. So my next Android phone here in Denmark, is going to have only a pre-paid $20 per month HSDPA data sim card, no voice or SMS plans, and I am going to be using SIP, Skype and Google Voice for all my voice communications, all included for free.

Agtain, the $20 per month HSDPA data plans are pre-paid only, no need to signup long term contracts. And if there is a contract (to subsidize a phone), contract length legal limit is 6 months not 24 months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Europe, we can get unlimited data connection plans for less than $20 per month on HSDPA sim cards. So my next Android phone here in Denmark, is going to have only a pre-paid $20 per month HSDPA data sim card, no voice or SMS plans, and I am going to be using SIP, Skype and Google Voice for all my voice communications, all included for free.</p>
<p>Agtain, the $20 per month HSDPA data plans are pre-paid only, no need to signup long term contracts. And if there is a contract (to subsidize a phone), contract length legal limit is 6 months not 24 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charbax</title>
		<link>http://www.rickycadden.com/2009/07/of-course-att-doesnt-want-google-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-721</link>
		<dc:creator>Charbax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 19:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickycadden.com/?p=476#comment-721</guid>
		<description>In Europe, we can get unlimited data connection plans for less than $20 per month on HSDPA sim cards. So my next Android phone here in Denmark, is going to have only a pre-paid $20 per month HSDPA data sim card, no voice or SMS plans, and I am going to be using SIP, Skype and Google Voice for all my voice communications, all included for free.

Agtain, the $20 per month HSDPA data plans are pre-paid only, no need to signup long term contracts. And if there is a contract (to subsidize a phone), contract length legal limit is 6 months not 24 months.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Europe, we can get unlimited data connection plans for less than $20 per month on HSDPA sim cards. So my next Android phone here in Denmark, is going to have only a pre-paid $20 per month HSDPA data sim card, no voice or SMS plans, and I am going to be using SIP, Skype and Google Voice for all my voice communications, all included for free.</p>
<p>Agtain, the $20 per month HSDPA data plans are pre-paid only, no need to signup long term contracts. And if there is a contract (to subsidize a phone), contract length legal limit is 6 months not 24 months.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.rickycadden.com/2009/07/of-course-att-doesnt-want-google-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-233</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickycadden.com/?p=476#comment-233</guid>
		<description>Google Voice is still available as a local app for Blackberry and Android. There&#039;s lots of Blackberries running on AT&amp;T ( and I have my Android phone on AT&amp;T too! ). It&#039;s also safe to assume that locally installed version of Google Voice will ( eventually ) be available for Windows Mobile phones running on AT&amp;T.

With the above in mind, all the Death Star  will *not* be able to stop Google Voice from being used on their network. All they are doing is stalling for time until a wifi only version gets built for the iPhone ( ala Skype and Sling iPhone apps ).

As to being a &quot;dumb pipe&quot; that is a foregone conclusion, better yet, AT&amp;T may not even be able to aspire to be that lowly status for much longer - Per this tweet by @ribbit:

http://twitter.com/Ribbit/status/2890586344

;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Voice is still available as a local app for Blackberry and Android. There&#8217;s lots of Blackberries running on AT&amp;T ( and I have my Android phone on AT&amp;T too! ). It&#8217;s also safe to assume that locally installed version of Google Voice will ( eventually ) be available for Windows Mobile phones running on AT&amp;T.</p>
<p>With the above in mind, all the Death Star  will *not* be able to stop Google Voice from being used on their network. All they are doing is stalling for time until a wifi only version gets built for the iPhone ( ala Skype and Sling iPhone apps ).</p>
<p>As to being a &#8220;dumb pipe&#8221; that is a foregone conclusion, better yet, AT&amp;T may not even be able to aspire to be that lowly status for much longer &#8211; Per this tweet by @ribbit:</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/Ribbit/status/2890586344" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/Ribbit/status/2890586344</a></p>
<p> <img src='http://www.rickycadden.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Todd</title>
		<link>http://www.rickycadden.com/2009/07/of-course-att-doesnt-want-google-voice/comment-page-1/#comment-720</link>
		<dc:creator>Todd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rickycadden.com/?p=476#comment-720</guid>
		<description>Google Voice is still available as a local app for Blackberry and Android. There&#039;s lots of Blackberries running on AT&amp;T ( and I have my Android phone on AT&amp;T too! ). It&#039;s also safe to assume that locally installed version of Google Voice will ( eventually ) be available for Windows Mobile phones running on AT&amp;T.

With the above in mind, all the Death Star  will *not* be able to stop Google Voice from being used on their network. All they are doing is stalling for time until a wifi only version gets built for the iPhone ( ala Skype and Sling iPhone apps ).

As to being a &quot;dumb pipe&quot; that is a foregone conclusion, better yet, AT&amp;T may not even be able to aspire to be that lowly status for much longer - Per this tweet by @ribbit:

http://twitter.com/Ribbit/status/2890586344

;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Google Voice is still available as a local app for Blackberry and Android. There&#8217;s lots of Blackberries running on AT&amp;T ( and I have my Android phone on AT&amp;T too! ). It&#8217;s also safe to assume that locally installed version of Google Voice will ( eventually ) be available for Windows Mobile phones running on AT&amp;T.</p>
<p>With the above in mind, all the Death Star  will *not* be able to stop Google Voice from being used on their network. All they are doing is stalling for time until a wifi only version gets built for the iPhone ( ala Skype and Sling iPhone apps ).</p>
<p>As to being a &#8220;dumb pipe&#8221; that is a foregone conclusion, better yet, AT&amp;T may not even be able to aspire to be that lowly status for much longer &#8211; Per this tweet by @ribbit:</p>
<p><a href="http://twitter.com/Ribbit/status/2890586344" rel="nofollow">http://twitter.com/Ribbit/status/2890586344</a></p>
<p> <img src='http://www.rickycadden.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

