Posts Tagged ‘spinvox’

Google Voice Vs. Spinvox: FIGHT!

// April 23rd, 2009 // 8 Comments » // Mobile, technology

I’ve been a Spinvox enthusiast for over a year now. I had previously completely turned Voicemail off on my phone, and Spinvox gave me a reason to turn it back on. You can read more about that here. Google Voice recently became available, including speech-to-text transcription, so I wanted to pit the two of them against each other. Google Voice is apparently only using software for recognition, while Spinvox maintains that it uses a combination of real live people and software, which should offer a better transcription experience.

Using the same phone, I called my cell phone, and left the same message with both services: ‘Hey dude, this is Ricky Cadden, call me back at 817-472-8391. Just seeing what you were up to.‘ The number is made-up, fyi. Here’s what I got from either service:

Google Voice:

hey dave this is rick you can call me back at (817) 472-8391 just see what you’re up to

Spinvox:

Hey dude, this is Ricky Tedon(?). Can call me back at 18174728391. Just See what you’re up to.

Sadly, neither service got the entire message correct. Google Voice misheard ‘dude’ for Dave, and completely left my last name out of the message. However, the number is formatted ‘prettier’ with Google Voice. Spinvox does a bit better, getting most of the message correct, and actually acknowledging that I said my last name. While Spinvox didn’t get my last name correct, they were kind enough to put a (?) tag, so that I would know they weren’t sure of that part of the message – handy. The number is presented in a raw format, but my Nokia N79 was still able to see that it was a phone number, so that I could just click to call it, similar to the Google Voice message.

I also noticed that Spinvox’s message is formatted more….formally. There is proper capitalization and punctuation, making it easier to read as a real sentence, rather than a jumble of words. Google Voice gets points for their excellent web interface, though. It’s tough to call a real ‘winner’ here, since neither service got the message correct in its entirety. Personally, I’ll stick with Spinvox, though I use my Google Voice number as a ‘disposable’ one, to give out to whoever wants it.
If you’re still using speech-based voicemail, I feel extremely sorry for you, especially with such great alternatives available. Speech-to-text is a prime example of how technology is being used to enrich and enable our real lives. I don’t have to waste time listening to voicemails and attempting to remember which button is delete and which is save. I just read my messages, and that’s it.

Stuff I Choose Not To Live Without

// January 6th, 2009 // 1 Comment » // technology

Zach @ The Outsidr posted his list of products that he simply can’t live without earlier, and as any blogger with nothing to talk about is prone to do, I’m going to carry on his ‘meme’ with my own list. Yes, of course we *could* live without these things, if absolutely necessary, so I’ve renamed my list, ‘Stuff I Choose Not To Live Without.’

First up, frankly, is my phone. Specifically, the Nokia N95-3. Sure, I’ve also got the E71-2, N79 NAM, 5800 XpressMusic, N82, and LG KT610 on my desk right now, but none can really truly replace my tried-and-true pocket companion. The Nokia N95-3 gives me a great camera (both photos and videos), full email access, internet, Jaiku, and of course, phone calls/SMS. It’s like having my laptop in my pocket, and I *could* post to my various blogs from it. I refuse to go anywhere without it.

Next up, obviously, is my Dell XPS M1330. I’m an online journalist/blogger, so obviously my laptop is vital to my livlihood. The XPS M1330 is by no means a top-of-the-line machine, but it’s small(ish), light, and packs plenty of kick to write posts, edit photos and videos, and anything else I need to do.

Last.FM is the first service on this list. While I maintain a rather large collection of MP3s, Last.FM gives me a fresh set of tunes, instantly tailored specifically to ME. I can type in ‘Productivity’ and get great working music, or ‘Relaxing’ and get music to calm me down. I use Mobbler on my N95-3, too, so I can enjoy Last.FM on the go.

Partially to appease James Whatley, I have to add Spinvox to this list. Spinvox takes the voicemails that my family and others leave me, converts them to text, and delivers it as an SMS. I’m bad about screening phone calls, so this lets me instantly and visually determine if I need to call you back today or next week. It’s completely brilliant, and something that gets used nearly every day.

Firefox is another non-hardware item that I simply could not live without. 95% of my workload is done in Firefox, and the other 5% could be, probably, if I wanted. It’s my window to the world, and like my Dell XPS M1330, it’s crucial to my livlihood.

I’ve talked about them before, but my Bose earphones are another thing that I would go nuts without. Oftentimes, I have trouble concentrating on the task at hand, but if I toss these in with Last.FM set to ‘techno’, I can push the rest of the world out of my view and simply focus on writing. They’re wonderful.

That’s it. 6 things that I absolutely choose not to live without. Of course, I have a ton of other fun toys that I would *prefer* not to live without, such as my external monitor, Fujitsu P1610, Nokia N800, and others, but the fact is that they are not absolutely vital in my day-to-date live. What about you?

Methods of Communication

// September 9th, 2008 // No Comments » // communication

James Whatley, at the Spinvox Blog, recently published some thoughts of his on ‘Confidence in Communication.’ If you’ve not read it, you’ll need to do so before my thoughts will make sense, so do that now. Here’s the link.

Ok, so, James basically says that for him, using Spinvox actually creates a sort of prioritization mechanism, the quotation marks, for him to know which messages are more important (as they originated from voice). However, I completely disagree. Spinvox isn’t creating any prioritization for me, it’s actually removing the voicemail category from my list entirely, and promoting voicemail up to the level of SMS. When I had voicemail (before I simply disabled my voicemailbox), a message might sit, unheard, for days on end. With SMS, it’s read immediately, and typically acted upon within 4 hrs, though usually in under an hour.

Spinvox also helps voice calls to not be so unbelievably annoying. You’re saying, ‘but you live and breathe mobile phones, so why is voice ranked so low in your mind?’ Easy, cause voice is the lease polite and respectful of my time. Voice phone calls are incredibly invasive. They’re basically the calling party saying to the recipient, ‘I don’t care what you’re doing right now. Whatever I have to say is infinitely more important, and thus I feel it’s ok to invade your time and demand your attention.’

A big statement, but it’s true. A voice call takes precedence over whatever you’re doing, unless your phone is on silent, but even then, I would imagine that you still glance at your phone to see who it is, and determine if they are indeed more important than what you’re doing at the moment.

Also, voicemail is not included in the list because it’s not communication – it’s notification. A voicemail is a notification that someone attempted to get ahold of you, and you were not there, so they left you a notification of the fact. More often than not, the message they actually left is simply, ‘Hey, it’s Bob, give me a call when you get this.’ Thanks Bob, because I couldn’t get that information by looking at my caller ID.

So then, how would I rank, in practice, my communication hierarchy?

1. face to face
2. email
3. IM
4. SMS
5. voice

James lists Social, but I don’t believe that is really a form of ‘communication’, necessarily. Sure, I’m active on Facebook, Jaiku, and a few others, but that’s not so much one-to-one communication. It’s more broadcast communication, and thus it doesn’t fit.

Email, as Zach points out, is actually personally preferred, due to the control that I have, though I would also add the organization mechanism. I can read an email, and then mark it as unread, so I’ll be prompted visually to check it later. I can also take as much time as I need to craft (yes, I consider it a skill to craft a really good email) a really good email response.

So, James wants to know if this new prioritization restores the primacy of voice? No. I’ve always seen voice as disruptive and invasive, unless the call is prescheduled. While that seems a bit cold and…anal, it’s also more polite, as I’m guaranteed to be attentive to you. Let’s say it’s 3pm in the afternoon and I receive a phone call. If I wasn’t expecting the call, I’m likely in the middle of working, probably reading or writing a post. If I answer, it’s unlikely that you’ll have my full attention, as I’ll be mentally trying to wrap up what I was doing.

However, if you email/IM/SMS me and say, ‘I’d like to talk to you about something, can I call you at 3p?’ then I’ll probably put it on my calendar, and a few moments before you call, I’ll be reminded. I can then have a few minutes to clear what I’m doing from my head, and be 100% focused on our phone call. It’s polite to you, and it’s respectful of my time. Win-win.

Spinvox helps facilitate this because I can send an incoming call to ‘voicemail’, which then delivers it to me instantly as an SMS. Without having to really interrupt what I’m doing, I can quickly glance over it and find out who called and what they wanted, and determine the immediacy. A regular voicemail would get no such attention.

Spinvox Loves Your Accent

// July 29th, 2008 // No Comments » // blogging, cool

I’m a massive fan of Spinvox. It’s no secret, I rave about them periodically on Symbian-Guru. If you’re sick of hassling with dialing in for your messages, give it a look, it’s awesome to get your voicemail delivered as an SMS. Pitches aside, my buddy James Whatley at Spinvox has worked up a really cool competition called ‘We Love Your Accent.

Basically, they’ve hooked up with Moblog.net to get you to call in and say that your favorite accents are. That’s it, whatever you speak will be automatically crossposted to the Moblog.net Love Your Accent blog, and you’ll be entered to win a Nokia N82 smartphone or a pack of 250 Moocards.

Unfortunately, this one’s only available to those in the UK, but I hope they put together something similar for the U.S., as it’s really a neat idea. I also find it cool cause I’m completely obsessed with accents. One of my favorite movie of all time is My Fair Lady, for the various accents used in the film.

What’s your favorite? I’m partial to something I like to call an ‘elegant twang’, which is typically found in central and east Texas, though I also *really* love hearing people with French accents.

The Future of Voice

// May 3rd, 2008 // No Comments » // Mobile

James Whatley has a thought provoking meandering thought over at the Spinvox blog, regarding the future of voice. With a service such as Spinvox, people’s voices are being converted into text. Sounds simple enough, but this actually affects quite a bit of stuff. It means that voice is now searchable, archivable.

James goes on about what your voice will *look* like, but honestly, that’s not what made me start thinking. The other part, where your spoken word is recorded and searchable, is completely fascinating. Working with Nokia on the S60 Ambassador program, we’re basically interested in the same thing – recording voice conversations (as reports) and tracking them, seeing what people are talking about, how others react, that sort of thing.

Used to, things that you said were safe. Spoken word is there, and then gone. Of course, it resides in the memory of the people present, but there it’s vulnerable to being erased (forgotten), misinterpreted, distorted, etc. When you convert speech into text, though, those limitations are removed.

How will this idea grow and progress? What is the actual ‘future of voice’?